Are Fossils Proof of Evolution?
Re-contructed T-Rex
Response
It is firstly important to note that many fossils documented in text books, and Evolution websites are recontructions!!!, very rarely are the full set of bones of a dead organism found, usually only partial fragments are found THEREFORE the rest of the fossils have to be RECONTRUCTED, using the imagination of whoever is doing them, often evolutionists are the ones who extrapolate these fossils, and they interpret it.
Secondly, it is important to note that fossils can not logically be prove of evolution, for instance, THE FOSSIL, may just be an extinct form of life, it doesnt neccesarily mean it is an intermediate form of life, and what is important to note is that It can not be proven if these fossils reproduced and had children.
Fossils are basically the preserved bones from the past which have been found in dirt/stone. They are found all over the world, even the tops of the highest mountains, (proving the mountains were underwater at one point) They may be as simple organisims like seashells which leave a permanent impression in sandstone
The fossils themselves do not directly tell us their age or how they got buried, both of these have to be infered from other methods. They must be interpreted within some view of earth history. Many people have been led to believe that the existence of fossils proves that
Fossils can form quite quickly. Heat and pressure from rapid burial accelerates the fossilisation process. Conditions following the worldwide flood of Noah as mentioned in the Quran, would have been bigger than anything imaginable today and must have led to the rapid fossilisation of plants and animals on a massive scale, which is why there are so many fossils.
Fossilisation can happen rapidly under the right conditions, but its rare today. Yet there are mass burial sites throughout the world that are tightly packed with millions of fossils. literally billions of organisms were washed together by the mass destruction of the worldwide flood, completely buried, and rapidly fossilised.
Geologists and paleontologists operating acknowledge the possibility that a worldwide catastrophe could have buried unimaginable amounts of plants and animals. Sea creatures would have been buried first (the salinity and temperature of the oceans would have changed during the catastrophe, wiping out massive numbers of these sea creatures)
Any order of burial in a flood would be possible, the general tendency would be for sea life to be buried in the lower rock layers and land animals to be buried in different rock layers corresponding to their ecological niche. This tendency is generally found